WIKIPEDIA IN HAND TO DEAL DE FAT BANKI © [Part I] The
ACTION OF THIS GREAT "Mecha"
clear, lucid, decisive!
http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussione:Signoraggio&diff=prev&oldid=6618307
version of 11:50, 27 January 2007
Mechano
I have read many sites the thesis that you (let me give you the Fotogian) defines "heterodox" and I read them carefully, then came to browse Wikipedia for read what was written here. And even if I found a different view I think this objective apparently. Now reading this I discover that there were many disagreements on This topic arose and I have doubts.
There is a video on Youtube easily retrievable by searching with the keyword "seigniorage" which is an extract of an interview with Minister of Transport Hon. Di Pietro, where he states firmly that the seigniorage is a scam doubly serious because it is legalized, or who has become the norm.
Then the same text of the Judgement of the case of Prof. Auriti are not exhaustive, rather, the gist of the sentence seems to be rather simplistic.
I deal with international trade and commodities, and in my work for various reasons, I always have to keep up with the financial markets.
There are also news and events that are easy to understand how seigniorage on the conspiracy theory is not entirely far-fetched species is acting as the Federal Reserve after replacing the governor with Bernanke.
Governor Bernanke had issued a directive to the U.S. dollar which now no longer required the serial number. So you already had some serious doubts about the real return on tangible wealth that had the dollar for what was possible with simple calculations to understand that the FA was printing more money than he could provide in return, and now without serial numbers that is more difficult if not impossible.
I take as an example the U.S. and the Federal Reserve because it seems to be the one that best makes sense as the seigniorage may be something dangerous to the economy of a country thus giving strength to the thesis of conspiracy, because it is the largest private banking system in the world to show the effects of its policy on a macroscopic scale.
be a coincidence that the U.S. is a nation are now incredibly in debt with its banks themselves?
And China before buying dollars and government bonds to prop up the U.S. economy, its largest market, with most of the other countries with which it does business hours will also accept barter raw materials, and also accepts local currency and even from African countries do not entirely politically stable when these coins appear in print under a counterpart in precious metals and genres o anche senza la certezza di ciò ma purché quel paese dimostri possibili ricchezze anche sotto forma di materie prime e produttività potenziale.
Non a caso Cina e Giappone deprezzano di pari passo con il dollaro le loro monete per mantenere comunque favorevole il bilancio delle esportazioni verso paesi che pagano in USD.
Chiusa la parentesi economica internazionale vengo al succo. Arrivato su wikipedia ho trovato una versione sul signoraggio che non mi ha convinto e non mi hanno convinto le parole di te Fotogian, perché non perdi occasione di denigrare l'altra fazione, quella che tu consideri dei "signoraggini" o complottisti. Anche il Prof. Auriti che tu definisci professore di Diritto Mercantile, era in realtà anche professore di Diritto International as well as philosophy of law, and I knew him personally because when I was living in the Marches have been to a seminar. The fact is that by naming only one of the subjects that the teacher taught that the Law Merchant and its desire you shall diminish the responsibility for monetary law. The professor Auriti in its initiative called "The currency of the people" in his books and explains very well why the blink of seigniorage and money should be left to the sovereign people and not to private entities. The Bank of Italy SpA is neither the state nor the government that is clear. Then there
note the alacrity with which you stop to refute and / or disparage conspiracy theories defining theories deemed unsubstantiated by economists (as economists? I would like at least some names of famous economist or agency not tied to a bank). There are countless times when you say to these people who should take a book of economics, that economics should be studied seriously. But now I would also like the way some of these books and would like a more tangible explanation as to why the conspiracy theorists would have no idea what they speak when the Hon. Di Pietro said exactly what they say about your "conspiracy" between the lines and what he writes Prof. Auriti. That the Hon. Peter is himself a conspiracy? Another little anecdote
parentheses; turning to Internet sites that I ended up talking about a certain Wilhelm Reich said he had discovered a vital energy that permeates things and that would also be able to heal and inspire well-being (or kill if it is of negative type) which gave the name of "Orgone". Although, from what he wrote, Reich seemed like a crazy horse, what surprised me in its history were not his fanciful theories and I do not care much about them. But it is interesting to note that the establishment and the scientific and medical community of the time they first said that Orgone does not exist, and even then they have imprisoned, tortured, burned his books and left to die in prison Wilhelm Reich.
How do theories about something that does not exist to subject everything to an individual who can not pose a danger because they theorized that the energy does not exist?
And then I wonder, given that the ideologies and assumptions of the conspiracy are unfounded because in this Wikipedia entry is happened such a mess, with deletions, application control and censorship, but especially strong emphasis on lost causes by Prof. Auriti and another individual who had made up his mind to go well against the establishment, rather than giving voice to both sides and to better investigate and refute either hypothesis?
Fotogian I do not know you do not know who you are, what studies have you done or what work you do and for whom, but at this point I also think that you have been sent by some large banks involved in the Big Scam of seigniorage is also convinced that the Hon. Di Pietro, to take control of this Wikipedia entry and prevent people from knowing the second bell, the one that says that the seigniorage is a terrible thing if it is applied as a simple press of waste paper and sold without any real equivalent to Member of the ticket at face value to be returned at that value plus interest.
So please, please take these questions on your good faith and let the Wikipedia is truly free and objective and does not report only your own vision of history and implications of seigniorage, which leaves only a paragraph to the opposite theory, among other things well filtered from your personal views and those of imaginary Economists who does not appoint.
I guarantee that the undersigned has no connection with those sites that speak of seigniorage in terms of big scam, but I am only an expert in international commerce and Internet users worried about his future and the economic crisis that are hitting the West and the danger that this thing of seigniorage could be the real cause of many of the ills of our country.
