Thursday, December 20, 2007
Friday, December 7, 2007
Where To Exchange Canadian In Wa
CVD wikipedia? another cog of the slaves of IGB!
A handful of men to govern Wikipedia
An email private administration, made public, reveals the existence of a group of "elect" and privately decided to other users of the free encyclopedia.
[ZEUS News - 06/12/2007 http://www.zeusnews.it/index.php3?ar=stampa&cod=6520]
Legend has it that Wikipedia is a virtual place where you work in harmony and transparency for make knowledge available to all, where problems are discussed in public and dove ognuno può dire la propria.
Una email scritta da una (ormai ex) amministratrice di Wikipedia, Durova, ha però svelato una realtà piuttosto differente.
Costei premeva per il ban di un molto attivo - e perciò sospetto, secondo l'admin - utente di Wikipedia, dal curioso nickname "!!" (doppio punto esclamativo): la Durova lo considerava uno di quelli che tentano di sabotare dall'interno l'enciclopedia libera, scrivendo informazioni fuorvianti o inesatte così da screditarla.
Tutta la discussione sarebbe avvenuta in una mailing list segreta, accessibile solo a pochi amministratori che potevano così decidere delle sorti di Wikipedia lontano dalla folla degli utenti.
Just an administrator, however, posting a private email to Durova, has brought to light this parallel reality, and The Register has also been responsible for spreading the news, which in these hours is making several people to discuss Wikipedia and more.
in addition to the discovery of a "business center secret" of what should be a collaborative effort that has no secrets, there's the fact that the allegations were unfounded Durova enough to force the administrator to resign from office together with the rapid reintegration of "!!". According to James
Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, but it would just "a storm in a teacup" since you wrongly banned was readmitted in just 75 minutes. On the other hand, we know that the same Wales has done everything to silence any dicussion about the secret mailing list, reports The Register again.
that the situation is perceived as serious as demonstrated by the words of Charles Ainswort, also reported by the English website: "I have never seen the Wikipedia community as angry as in this case. I think there was more hidden anger and frustration with the" clique that rules "of what I thought and Durova's aggressive behavior and his arrogant refusal to take sufficient information they did come out."
The problem is not in fact the existence a mailing list for coordination among administrators, but its secrecy and the consequent behavior of the chosen few, a situation in which a project such as Wikipedia did not just come to exist.
This whole story has so angered many and raised the suspicion of an initiative worthy but still, from time to time, has already been criticized for a perceived lack of transparency and democracy. "
A handful of men to govern Wikipedia
An email private administration, made public, reveals the existence of a group of "elect" and privately decided to other users of the free encyclopedia.
[ZEUS News - 06/12/2007 http://www.zeusnews.it/index.php3?ar=stampa&cod=6520]
Legend has it that Wikipedia is a virtual place where you work in harmony and transparency for make knowledge available to all, where problems are discussed in public and dove ognuno può dire la propria.
Una email scritta da una (ormai ex) amministratrice di Wikipedia, Durova, ha però svelato una realtà piuttosto differente.
Costei premeva per il ban di un molto attivo - e perciò sospetto, secondo l'admin - utente di Wikipedia, dal curioso nickname "!!" (doppio punto esclamativo): la Durova lo considerava uno di quelli che tentano di sabotare dall'interno l'enciclopedia libera, scrivendo informazioni fuorvianti o inesatte così da screditarla.
Tutta la discussione sarebbe avvenuta in una mailing list segreta, accessibile solo a pochi amministratori che potevano così decidere delle sorti di Wikipedia lontano dalla folla degli utenti.
Just an administrator, however, posting a private email to Durova, has brought to light this parallel reality, and The Register has also been responsible for spreading the news, which in these hours is making several people to discuss Wikipedia and more.
in addition to the discovery of a "business center secret" of what should be a collaborative effort that has no secrets, there's the fact that the allegations were unfounded Durova enough to force the administrator to resign from office together with the rapid reintegration of "!!". According to James
Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, but it would just "a storm in a teacup" since you wrongly banned was readmitted in just 75 minutes. On the other hand, we know that the same Wales has done everything to silence any dicussion about the secret mailing list, reports The Register again.
that the situation is perceived as serious as demonstrated by the words of Charles Ainswort, also reported by the English website: "I have never seen the Wikipedia community as angry as in this case. I think there was more hidden anger and frustration with the" clique that rules "of what I thought and Durova's aggressive behavior and his arrogant refusal to take sufficient information they did come out."
The problem is not in fact the existence a mailing list for coordination among administrators, but its secrecy and the consequent behavior of the chosen few, a situation in which a project such as Wikipedia did not just come to exist.
This whole story has so angered many and raised the suspicion of an initiative worthy but still, from time to time, has already been criticized for a perceived lack of transparency and democracy. "
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Is Guy Getting Eyebrow Waxed Gay
23 year old wankers? almost ..
WIKIPEDIA: A twenty-four COMMUNITY deceive users'
ROME - More than a 'nom de plume' was created as a new Fernando Pessoa, a heteronym. Under the austere and professorial guise of Essjay, Ph.D. an expert in the history of religions, especially Catholicism, an enterprising young man of 24 years has mocked the community of users and supporters Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia multilingual and accessible to all via the Internet.
The alias of Essjay was Ryan Jordan chose to make a profit or loss as an administrator and Editor, by Wikia, a company related multimedia encyclopedia. Case of Jordan, who had presented to users as lecturer in canon law at a private university, he is entrusted with the International Herald Tribune and, last week, has written the weekly New Yorker. For the leaders of the Commons was not easy to go back to his true identity, since the person concerned had avoided for months to respond to emails in which they were trying to get in touch with him.
His explanation was that the alias he used to escape the 'ambush' of hundreds of readers, who would have flooded with messages and requests for further study, something that would have taken excessive time and energy. But if this explanation was found to have initially by a number of players at the end did not convince the majority of users, who have felt cheated and have put into question the transparency that should be the basic computer system which is based on Wikipedia.
For the company instead, said the IHT, the fact that at the end of all editorial interventions traces remain available to users is just a test of the system of transparency and good faith of those who manage it. Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia co-founder and driving force behind its growth, had initially said he had received an apology from Jordan for the possible reputational damage caused to the encyclopedia, adding that they have accepted, in recognition of the fact that the boy had correctness of content made with thousands of operations as editor-reviewer.
But for the majority degli utenti la frode é rimasta e in sostanza si riassume in 'abuso di titolo' e nell'aver carpito la buona fede del pubblico. Wales, che nel frattempo ha cambiato opinione e indurito la sua posizione nei confronti del collaboratore, sabato scorso ne ha chiesto le dimissioni. Stavolta Jordan non ha giocato sull'equivoco e le ha prontamente presentate. E forse, con lui, è uscito di scena anche il suo eteronimo.
da: http://www.ansa.it/opencms/export/site/visualizza_fdg.html_2110913441.html
WIKIPEDIA: A twenty-four COMMUNITY deceive users'
ROME - More than a 'nom de plume' was created as a new Fernando Pessoa, a heteronym. Under the austere and professorial guise of Essjay, Ph.D. an expert in the history of religions, especially Catholicism, an enterprising young man of 24 years has mocked the community of users and supporters Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia multilingual and accessible to all via the Internet.
The alias of Essjay was Ryan Jordan chose to make a profit or loss as an administrator and Editor, by Wikia, a company related multimedia encyclopedia. Case of Jordan, who had presented to users as lecturer in canon law at a private university, he is entrusted with the International Herald Tribune and, last week, has written the weekly New Yorker. For the leaders of the Commons was not easy to go back to his true identity, since the person concerned had avoided for months to respond to emails in which they were trying to get in touch with him.
His explanation was that the alias he used to escape the 'ambush' of hundreds of readers, who would have flooded with messages and requests for further study, something that would have taken excessive time and energy. But if this explanation was found to have initially by a number of players at the end did not convince the majority of users, who have felt cheated and have put into question the transparency that should be the basic computer system which is based on Wikipedia.
For the company instead, said the IHT, the fact that at the end of all editorial interventions traces remain available to users is just a test of the system of transparency and good faith of those who manage it. Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia co-founder and driving force behind its growth, had initially said he had received an apology from Jordan for the possible reputational damage caused to the encyclopedia, adding that they have accepted, in recognition of the fact that the boy had correctness of content made with thousands of operations as editor-reviewer.
But for the majority degli utenti la frode é rimasta e in sostanza si riassume in 'abuso di titolo' e nell'aver carpito la buona fede del pubblico. Wales, che nel frattempo ha cambiato opinione e indurito la sua posizione nei confronti del collaboratore, sabato scorso ne ha chiesto le dimissioni. Stavolta Jordan non ha giocato sull'equivoco e le ha prontamente presentate. E forse, con lui, è uscito di scena anche il suo eteronimo.
da: http://www.ansa.it/opencms/export/site/visualizza_fdg.html_2110913441.html
Monday, March 5, 2007
Period Smells Like Hair Dye
WIKIPEDIA-ITALY increasingly in chocolate that smells and is not sold in cans ..
Se si consultano le voci dei personaggi storici nell'Enciclopedia Wikipedia, immancabilmente si nota come ciò che vi é descritto sia oltremodo lacunoso and elusive. This is because those items have not been compiled by scholars well-known but anonymous amateur with a ball of historians, who have plagiarized information from other encyclopedias. To bridge the extent those items were then arranged by anonymous factotum of Wikipedia, its 'administrator', who went to look for evidence in the same encyclopedia which was plagiarized from the amateurs: Administrators have been forced to prune anecdotes and details from those voices, because they feared a copy paro paro other encyclopedias, incurring complaints for copyright infringement, or adjustment to, on its own initiative, to run into inaccuracies and blunders, conscious of their ignorance. Moral: After reading the beautiful voice 'Julius Caesar' in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and after reading the abominable in Wikipedia, it is natural to ask: "What is the purpose of Wikipedia? What's behind the facade of the Free Encyclopedia online?". I, who for more than a year, I compared it with Wikipedia and I fight, I can provide a complete answer in four words: "Wikipedia is a business." The Director, Mr. Jimmy Wales, before founding two years he had worked on the Stock New York: the experience that has marked this in the New York Stock Exchange, because Mr. Jimmy Wales has also designed the Free Encyclopedia online in these terms: "To me, the bag! To you, your stories!" . And in fact the business is in the 'donations' that Mr. Jimmy Wales EIMBURSEMENT directly from a multinational crowd of boastful and impostors who flock to appear in Wikipedia to exalt his own image and mystify their own history. Neither Mr. Jimmy Wales could meet this kind of customers better than it has done: to appear in Wikipedia enough to be promoted by one who has already appeared! Once the new client will appear, and you put your conscience with the 'gift', you can describe your voice, and pass as historical events, all the dreams that until then did he open your eyes ... One of these impostors appeared in Wikipedia, Gianni De Martino, I passed himself off as "one of the founders of the magazine World Beat" magazine in I've been a founder and the chief. Shocked that such deception could appear in an encyclopedia, still unaware that Wikipedia did not meet the criteria of knowledge, but for profit, I turned to its managers. They did in my first email on deaf ears. The second they sent in the form of an open letter, addressed also to newspapers and intellectuals, administrators and then made the appearance of those who bring non-partisan, "Gerbino De Martino and quarrel to go away from Wikipedia!" - And let the voice "Gianni De Martino" as it was, in fact protecting us imposture. At the third email I threatened them: I and other 'old' World Beat we vandalized Wikipedia a viso aperto e a oltranza, fin tanto che vi fosse apparso che Gianni De Martino era stato "uno dei fondatori della rivista Mondo Beat", e allora, minacciati nel business, gli amministratori bloccarono e oscurarono la voce "gianni de martino", ma non di meno il loro presidente italiano, tale 'Senpai' (?), intervenne direttamente nella 'discussione' di quella voce e promise a Gianni De Martino (che é uno che ovviamente ha pagato la 'donazione') che gli avrebbe ripristinato la voce quando 'il maleducato' (io) non si fosse fatto più sentire.E fu così, dopo questo primo approccio, che io cominciai a rendermi conto di cosa sia veramente Wikipedia, e del perchè la voce di Cesare vi appaia mortificata e quella di De Pincopallino magnified. (continua!) Melchiorre Gerbino - Copenhagen, March 2007
Se si consultano le voci dei personaggi storici nell'Enciclopedia Wikipedia, immancabilmente si nota come ciò che vi é descritto sia oltremodo lacunoso and elusive. This is because those items have not been compiled by scholars well-known but anonymous amateur with a ball of historians, who have plagiarized information from other encyclopedias. To bridge the extent those items were then arranged by anonymous factotum of Wikipedia, its 'administrator', who went to look for evidence in the same encyclopedia which was plagiarized from the amateurs: Administrators have been forced to prune anecdotes and details from those voices, because they feared a copy paro paro other encyclopedias, incurring complaints for copyright infringement, or adjustment to, on its own initiative, to run into inaccuracies and blunders, conscious of their ignorance. Moral: After reading the beautiful voice 'Julius Caesar' in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and after reading the abominable in Wikipedia, it is natural to ask: "What is the purpose of Wikipedia? What's behind the facade of the Free Encyclopedia online?". I, who for more than a year, I compared it with Wikipedia and I fight, I can provide a complete answer in four words: "Wikipedia is a business." The Director, Mr. Jimmy Wales, before founding two years he had worked on the Stock New York: the experience that has marked this in the New York Stock Exchange, because Mr. Jimmy Wales has also designed the Free Encyclopedia online in these terms: "To me, the bag! To you, your stories!" . And in fact the business is in the 'donations' that Mr. Jimmy Wales EIMBURSEMENT directly from a multinational crowd of boastful and impostors who flock to appear in Wikipedia to exalt his own image and mystify their own history. Neither Mr. Jimmy Wales could meet this kind of customers better than it has done: to appear in Wikipedia enough to be promoted by one who has already appeared! Once the new client will appear, and you put your conscience with the 'gift', you can describe your voice, and pass as historical events, all the dreams that until then did he open your eyes ... One of these impostors appeared in Wikipedia, Gianni De Martino, I passed himself off as "one of the founders of the magazine World Beat" magazine in I've been a founder and the chief. Shocked that such deception could appear in an encyclopedia, still unaware that Wikipedia did not meet the criteria of knowledge, but for profit, I turned to its managers. They did in my first email on deaf ears. The second they sent in the form of an open letter, addressed also to newspapers and intellectuals, administrators and then made the appearance of those who bring non-partisan, "Gerbino De Martino and quarrel to go away from Wikipedia!" - And let the voice "Gianni De Martino" as it was, in fact protecting us imposture. At the third email I threatened them: I and other 'old' World Beat we vandalized Wikipedia a viso aperto e a oltranza, fin tanto che vi fosse apparso che Gianni De Martino era stato "uno dei fondatori della rivista Mondo Beat", e allora, minacciati nel business, gli amministratori bloccarono e oscurarono la voce "gianni de martino", ma non di meno il loro presidente italiano, tale 'Senpai' (?), intervenne direttamente nella 'discussione' di quella voce e promise a Gianni De Martino (che é uno che ovviamente ha pagato la 'donazione') che gli avrebbe ripristinato la voce quando 'il maleducato' (io) non si fosse fatto più sentire.E fu così, dopo questo primo approccio, che io cominciai a rendermi conto di cosa sia veramente Wikipedia, e del perchè la voce di Cesare vi appaia mortificata e quella di De Pincopallino magnified. (continua!) Melchiorre Gerbino - Copenhagen, March 2007
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Bip Of Clothes Sharking
CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN HAND TO WIKIPEDIA FOTOGIAN
QUESTION: BUT WHY
'DEFENDS FOTOGIAN COSI'
strenuously its seigniorage is Wikipedia?
THAT HAS TIES WITH WIKIPEDIA?
SIMPLE:
ITS SITE OF PHOTOGRAPHY HAS
10,000 (yes, ten!)
via links MONTHLY VISITS TO WIKIPEDIA
January 2007: 10,240
February 2007: 9495
from the counters on the page Staff Photographer
GIANLUCA has demonstrated that:
and if we take A random page of Wikipedia-ITALY:
AND THIS FOR HUNDREDS OF LINKS!
what else to say?
CONFLICT OF INTEREST?!
BAH! 
QUESTION: BUT WHY
'DEFENDS FOTOGIAN COSI'
strenuously its seigniorage is Wikipedia?
THAT HAS TIES WITH WIKIPEDIA?
SIMPLE:
ITS SITE OF PHOTOGRAPHY HAS
10,000 (yes, ten!)
via links MONTHLY VISITS TO WIKIPEDIA
January 2007: 10,240
February 2007: 9495
from the counters on the page Staff Photographer
GIANLUCA has demonstrated that:
and if we take A random page of Wikipedia-ITALY:
AND THIS FOR HUNDREDS OF LINKS!
what else to say?
CONFLICT OF INTEREST?!
BAH!
Friday, February 9, 2007
Moncler Jackets Can Ai Wash It
WIKIPEDIA IN HAND TO DEAL DE FAT BANKI © [Part I] The
ACTION OF THIS GREAT "Mecha"
clear, lucid, decisive!
http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussione:Signoraggio&diff=prev&oldid=6618307
version of 11:50, 27 January 2007
Mechano
I have read many sites the thesis that you (let me give you the Fotogian) defines "heterodox" and I read them carefully, then came to browse Wikipedia for read what was written here. And even if I found a different view I think this objective apparently. Now reading this I discover that there were many disagreements on This topic arose and I have doubts.
There is a video on Youtube easily retrievable by searching with the keyword "seigniorage" which is an extract of an interview with Minister of Transport Hon. Di Pietro, where he states firmly that the seigniorage is a scam doubly serious because it is legalized, or who has become the norm.
Then the same text of the Judgement of the case of Prof. Auriti are not exhaustive, rather, the gist of the sentence seems to be rather simplistic.
I deal with international trade and commodities, and in my work for various reasons, I always have to keep up with the financial markets.
There are also news and events that are easy to understand how seigniorage on the conspiracy theory is not entirely far-fetched species is acting as the Federal Reserve after replacing the governor with Bernanke.
Governor Bernanke had issued a directive to the U.S. dollar which now no longer required the serial number. So you already had some serious doubts about the real return on tangible wealth that had the dollar for what was possible with simple calculations to understand that the FA was printing more money than he could provide in return, and now without serial numbers that is more difficult if not impossible.
I take as an example the U.S. and the Federal Reserve because it seems to be the one that best makes sense as the seigniorage may be something dangerous to the economy of a country thus giving strength to the thesis of conspiracy, because it is the largest private banking system in the world to show the effects of its policy on a macroscopic scale.
be a coincidence that the U.S. is a nation are now incredibly in debt with its banks themselves?
And China before buying dollars and government bonds to prop up the U.S. economy, its largest market, with most of the other countries with which it does business hours will also accept barter raw materials, and also accepts local currency and even from African countries do not entirely politically stable when these coins appear in print under a counterpart in precious metals and genres o anche senza la certezza di ciò ma purché quel paese dimostri possibili ricchezze anche sotto forma di materie prime e produttività potenziale.
Non a caso Cina e Giappone deprezzano di pari passo con il dollaro le loro monete per mantenere comunque favorevole il bilancio delle esportazioni verso paesi che pagano in USD.
Chiusa la parentesi economica internazionale vengo al succo. Arrivato su wikipedia ho trovato una versione sul signoraggio che non mi ha convinto e non mi hanno convinto le parole di te Fotogian, perché non perdi occasione di denigrare l'altra fazione, quella che tu consideri dei "signoraggini" o complottisti. Anche il Prof. Auriti che tu definisci professore di Diritto Mercantile, era in realtà anche professore di Diritto International as well as philosophy of law, and I knew him personally because when I was living in the Marches have been to a seminar. The fact is that by naming only one of the subjects that the teacher taught that the Law Merchant and its desire you shall diminish the responsibility for monetary law. The professor Auriti in its initiative called "The currency of the people" in his books and explains very well why the blink of seigniorage and money should be left to the sovereign people and not to private entities. The Bank of Italy SpA is neither the state nor the government that is clear. Then there
note the alacrity with which you stop to refute and / or disparage conspiracy theories defining theories deemed unsubstantiated by economists (as economists? I would like at least some names of famous economist or agency not tied to a bank). There are countless times when you say to these people who should take a book of economics, that economics should be studied seriously. But now I would also like the way some of these books and would like a more tangible explanation as to why the conspiracy theorists would have no idea what they speak when the Hon. Di Pietro said exactly what they say about your "conspiracy" between the lines and what he writes Prof. Auriti. That the Hon. Peter is himself a conspiracy? Another little anecdote
parentheses; turning to Internet sites that I ended up talking about a certain Wilhelm Reich said he had discovered a vital energy that permeates things and that would also be able to heal and inspire well-being (or kill if it is of negative type) which gave the name of "Orgone". Although, from what he wrote, Reich seemed like a crazy horse, what surprised me in its history were not his fanciful theories and I do not care much about them. But it is interesting to note that the establishment and the scientific and medical community of the time they first said that Orgone does not exist, and even then they have imprisoned, tortured, burned his books and left to die in prison Wilhelm Reich.
How do theories about something that does not exist to subject everything to an individual who can not pose a danger because they theorized that the energy does not exist?
And then I wonder, given that the ideologies and assumptions of the conspiracy are unfounded because in this Wikipedia entry is happened such a mess, with deletions, application control and censorship, but especially strong emphasis on lost causes by Prof. Auriti and another individual who had made up his mind to go well against the establishment, rather than giving voice to both sides and to better investigate and refute either hypothesis?
Fotogian I do not know you do not know who you are, what studies have you done or what work you do and for whom, but at this point I also think that you have been sent by some large banks involved in the Big Scam of seigniorage is also convinced that the Hon. Di Pietro, to take control of this Wikipedia entry and prevent people from knowing the second bell, the one that says that the seigniorage is a terrible thing if it is applied as a simple press of waste paper and sold without any real equivalent to Member of the ticket at face value to be returned at that value plus interest.
So please, please take these questions on your good faith and let the Wikipedia is truly free and objective and does not report only your own vision of history and implications of seigniorage, which leaves only a paragraph to the opposite theory, among other things well filtered from your personal views and those of imaginary Economists who does not appoint.
I guarantee that the undersigned has no connection with those sites that speak of seigniorage in terms of big scam, but I am only an expert in international commerce and Internet users worried about his future and the economic crisis that are hitting the West and the danger that this thing of seigniorage could be the real cause of many of the ills of our country.
ACTION OF THIS GREAT "Mecha"
clear, lucid, decisive!
http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussione:Signoraggio&diff=prev&oldid=6618307
version of 11:50, 27 January 2007
Mechano
I have read many sites the thesis that you (let me give you the Fotogian) defines "heterodox" and I read them carefully, then came to browse Wikipedia for read what was written here. And even if I found a different view I think this objective apparently. Now reading this I discover that there were many disagreements on This topic arose and I have doubts.
There is a video on Youtube easily retrievable by searching with the keyword "seigniorage" which is an extract of an interview with Minister of Transport Hon. Di Pietro, where he states firmly that the seigniorage is a scam doubly serious because it is legalized, or who has become the norm.
Then the same text of the Judgement of the case of Prof. Auriti are not exhaustive, rather, the gist of the sentence seems to be rather simplistic.
I deal with international trade and commodities, and in my work for various reasons, I always have to keep up with the financial markets.
There are also news and events that are easy to understand how seigniorage on the conspiracy theory is not entirely far-fetched species is acting as the Federal Reserve after replacing the governor with Bernanke.
Governor Bernanke had issued a directive to the U.S. dollar which now no longer required the serial number. So you already had some serious doubts about the real return on tangible wealth that had the dollar for what was possible with simple calculations to understand that the FA was printing more money than he could provide in return, and now without serial numbers that is more difficult if not impossible.
I take as an example the U.S. and the Federal Reserve because it seems to be the one that best makes sense as the seigniorage may be something dangerous to the economy of a country thus giving strength to the thesis of conspiracy, because it is the largest private banking system in the world to show the effects of its policy on a macroscopic scale.
be a coincidence that the U.S. is a nation are now incredibly in debt with its banks themselves?
And China before buying dollars and government bonds to prop up the U.S. economy, its largest market, with most of the other countries with which it does business hours will also accept barter raw materials, and also accepts local currency and even from African countries do not entirely politically stable when these coins appear in print under a counterpart in precious metals and genres o anche senza la certezza di ciò ma purché quel paese dimostri possibili ricchezze anche sotto forma di materie prime e produttività potenziale.
Non a caso Cina e Giappone deprezzano di pari passo con il dollaro le loro monete per mantenere comunque favorevole il bilancio delle esportazioni verso paesi che pagano in USD.
Chiusa la parentesi economica internazionale vengo al succo. Arrivato su wikipedia ho trovato una versione sul signoraggio che non mi ha convinto e non mi hanno convinto le parole di te Fotogian, perché non perdi occasione di denigrare l'altra fazione, quella che tu consideri dei "signoraggini" o complottisti. Anche il Prof. Auriti che tu definisci professore di Diritto Mercantile, era in realtà anche professore di Diritto International as well as philosophy of law, and I knew him personally because when I was living in the Marches have been to a seminar. The fact is that by naming only one of the subjects that the teacher taught that the Law Merchant and its desire you shall diminish the responsibility for monetary law. The professor Auriti in its initiative called "The currency of the people" in his books and explains very well why the blink of seigniorage and money should be left to the sovereign people and not to private entities. The Bank of Italy SpA is neither the state nor the government that is clear. Then there
note the alacrity with which you stop to refute and / or disparage conspiracy theories defining theories deemed unsubstantiated by economists (as economists? I would like at least some names of famous economist or agency not tied to a bank). There are countless times when you say to these people who should take a book of economics, that economics should be studied seriously. But now I would also like the way some of these books and would like a more tangible explanation as to why the conspiracy theorists would have no idea what they speak when the Hon. Di Pietro said exactly what they say about your "conspiracy" between the lines and what he writes Prof. Auriti. That the Hon. Peter is himself a conspiracy? Another little anecdote
parentheses; turning to Internet sites that I ended up talking about a certain Wilhelm Reich said he had discovered a vital energy that permeates things and that would also be able to heal and inspire well-being (or kill if it is of negative type) which gave the name of "Orgone". Although, from what he wrote, Reich seemed like a crazy horse, what surprised me in its history were not his fanciful theories and I do not care much about them. But it is interesting to note that the establishment and the scientific and medical community of the time they first said that Orgone does not exist, and even then they have imprisoned, tortured, burned his books and left to die in prison Wilhelm Reich.
How do theories about something that does not exist to subject everything to an individual who can not pose a danger because they theorized that the energy does not exist?
And then I wonder, given that the ideologies and assumptions of the conspiracy are unfounded because in this Wikipedia entry is happened such a mess, with deletions, application control and censorship, but especially strong emphasis on lost causes by Prof. Auriti and another individual who had made up his mind to go well against the establishment, rather than giving voice to both sides and to better investigate and refute either hypothesis?
Fotogian I do not know you do not know who you are, what studies have you done or what work you do and for whom, but at this point I also think that you have been sent by some large banks involved in the Big Scam of seigniorage is also convinced that the Hon. Di Pietro, to take control of this Wikipedia entry and prevent people from knowing the second bell, the one that says that the seigniorage is a terrible thing if it is applied as a simple press of waste paper and sold without any real equivalent to Member of the ticket at face value to be returned at that value plus interest.
So please, please take these questions on your good faith and let the Wikipedia is truly free and objective and does not report only your own vision of history and implications of seigniorage, which leaves only a paragraph to the opposite theory, among other things well filtered from your personal views and those of imaginary Economists who does not appoint.
I guarantee that the undersigned has no connection with those sites that speak of seigniorage in terms of big scam, but I am only an expert in international commerce and Internet users worried about his future and the economic crisis that are hitting the West and the danger that this thing of seigniorage could be the real cause of many of the ills of our country.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)